Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Erich Kuerschner's avatar

--Hi Be.

Thank you so much for your efforts to visualize how peace might happen. I so LOVE that about you, and the Universal Unitarians.

Here are my thoughts. First, I hope my vision ends up where yours does, I.E. in “Forgiveness is key,”

Or “An eye for an eye makes us all blind”. That is SO in the right direction. If one fears “punishment” for what one says, that fear MUST be removed BEFORE a meaningful discussion can begin. So I write to contribute my small part, MY vision of how a meaningful peace might be achieved.

I would like to start with another Gandhi observation:

“The way of peace is the way of truth. Truthfulness is even more important than peacefulness.

Indeed, lying is the mother of violence.” --- Gandhi

To me ALL problems are a result of ignorance of not knowing the truth, along the lines of

Niebuhr’s “Serenity Prayer”. Turmoil comes from thinking "There MUST be a better way, and

not knowing what that better way IS.

Leaders don’t do the killing in wars; their followers do the killing. Iknow of no evidence that EITHER Hitler HIMSELF nor Putin HIMSELF killed a single person. The higher ignorance here is the belief that there are occasions when killing another human is justified, is acceptable, and that some problems can be successfully resolved by killing someone, either for their possessions ,or to silence their voice. And to thus think that leaders can/must/should change without changing ourselves. Individuals in the aggregate, not "rulers", have the real power.

As Gandhi (and Ettiene La Boetie,in his "Discourse on Voluntary Servitude") stated :

"I believe that no government can exist for a single moment without the cooperation of the people, willing or forced, and if people suddenly withdraw their cooperation in every detail, the government will come to a standstill.”

My vision would focus, not on the behavior of apparent leaders, but on the behavior of religious

organization, following MLK’s suggestion that what is needed is a “Revolution of Values.” (or as

the Santa Fe Institutes Samuel Bowles suggests: “Good laws are not a substitute for good

citizens.”) Congregations would have regular talking sessions, where individual members would

feel free to express and share their concerns on “what causes war” in general, or with specific

reference to Ukraine with each other, on the principle that truth matters, and that truth is indeed

what sets us free and unites our soul with universal consciousness/ Godhead. And as Rev. Gary

Kowalski pointed out in his sermon on “Better Together”, collectively we might each contribute a

part to a solution none are able to see in its entirety. They would discuss Christ’s (or whatever

prophet speaks most clearly to them) position on killing and demonizing a people, and instead

of portraying Russia and Putin as evil, explore how, in practical terms, one goes about “loving

your enemy”, “resisting not evil "," turning the other cheek”, “cease from judging other individuals”

and exploring how that position of hating an individual or an aggregation of individuals came into

being.

That discussion would look to FOREIGN or domestically DISSIDENT voices in their effort to

LOVE; LOVE after all being the ability to understand another, realizing the truth told by IF Stone

“ALL governments lie”. One would discuss the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact by Gorbachev,

on the idea that force is an unacceptable way to resolve disputes, as a goodwill initiative to the

previous adversarial “West”. One would read Putin’s speeches and understand the conditions

under which the post Warsaw Pact Russia would likely use force. One would also read and

discuss US publication to learn how the U.S. and NATO responded to Gorbachev’s peace

initiative. One would also discuss what one might be doing on a personal level, that would

cause someone to feel afraid, and what one might do individually, collectively as part of

a congregation, and how one might unite with other faith based groups to leverage their

message of how to make a better world.

And at some point, this discussion would lead to, and the congregation would happily embrace,

a discussion of the Nuclear Weapons “Modernization” program at Los Alamos National Labs,

and learn how one’s actions impact that program and world peace. They would begin with

learning the truth about “Why the bomb was built” and how the bomb was envisioned to be

used. All this discussion would be under the umbrella of “understanding”, and not “blaming”, but

based on a truth reconciliation process, with apologies, and then that all important forgiveness,

of oneself and others. In fact, in the most positive possible visualization for peace would have us

move directly to a discussion of THAT weapons program, realizing in the bottom of our hearts,

perhaps those bombs ARE just maybe, built for World Domination, and our acquiescence might

be responsible for what is happening in Ukraine? And once we withdraw our condolence of that

expansion of nuclear weapons, and this “modernization” (AKA as the U.S. wet dream for world

domination-aka as the benevolent despot) effort disappears, we reach agreement that, as the

Pope has stated, “Possession of Nuclear Weapons is IMMORAL”, as is their use for “deterrent”.

and the world agrees to abolish them. And then, at the Federal level, we create a Department

for Peace, for as JFK stated, we can’t have peace until we elevate the status of a conscientious

objector to the status of a soldier. And we enact a bill such as HB171, introduced by former

RCLC director, Andrea Romero, to Create a NM of Peacebuilding, to

“ teach the skills for nonviolent living in our schools statewide: dialogue, mediation and

Restorative Justice promoting Public Safety in NM homes, schools and communities. “

If Andrea can change THAT MUCH, so can anyone. Never say never.

“The way of peace is the way of truth. Truthfulness is even more important than peacefulness. Indeed, lying is the mother of violence.”---- Gandhi

"The fact is, I see no compelling reason why we should not unilaterally get rid of nuclear weapons. To maintain them is costly and adds nothing to our security." ---Paul Nitze, A Threat Mostly to Ourselves - New York Times http://nyti.ms/TAG6pU

"There is nothing comparable in our history to the deceit and the lying that took place as a matter of official Government policy in order to protect this [nuclear weapons] industry," said Mr.[Stewart] Udall. "Nothing was going to stop them and they were willing to kill our own people. ... "The atomic weapons race and the secrecy surrounding it crushed American democracy," Mr. Udall said in a interview. "It induced us to conduct Government according to lies. It distorted justice. It undermined American morality. Until the cold war, our country stood for something.”--- NY Times 8 June 1993

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.". -- President Dwight D. Eisenhower

Erich Kuerschner, Public Choice Economist

17 State Road 230

El Prado, NM 87529

503-737-8507

erichwwk@gmail.com

Expand full comment
Patsy Scott's avatar

Well said Be.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts